gay

All posts tagged gay

A Feminist Case Against Gay Marriage

Published February 10, 2012 by blacknright
Rainbow flag. Symbol of gay pride.

Image via Wikipedia

Though I do not purport to be a feminist, in fact, I abhor the very idea, that doesn’t mean that I am incapable of seeing something from the other person’s perspective. Somehow the gay movement has gotten itself aligned with the Civil Rights Movement and Women’s Rights movement to the detriment of both. While most feminists are devoutly pro-gay, that doesn’t mean that all feminists are. Since the pro-gay feminists have their voice already in the fray, I will be playing Devil‘s Advocate for feminists who oppose gay marriage.

A feminist worth their salt would reject gay marriage as an assault on women. I can see the people rolling in the aisles already, such an assertion is lunancy. However, the proponents of gay marriage want marriage to be a “basic human right.” By making it a right,  you are disregarding a very important aspect of marriage-the ability to reject a marriage partner based on your own free will. A right cannot be rejected simply because you don’t want to adhere to it. For instance, I cannot be denied the right to vote based on my skin color, no matter what you may or may not think of my skin color. My right to vote is not conditional on your opinion of me. However, you do have the “right” to not to marry me based on my skin color, or my weight or that you simply do not like me. Those are valid reasons not to marry me. Whether or not they are discriminatory is irrelevant, marriage is the joining of two people (male and female)  who have made a commitment to one another of their own free will to be wed and to raise a family. To force someone to marry another person is indeed a form of slavery.

Marriage DayNext, if marriage does become a right. It will be a right for men,not women. Historically, whenever marriages have been perceived as a right, it was the men who were able to choose their bride and the women pretty much had to go along for the ride. Women’s rights will be greatly affected should marriage become a right once more. Poor women would be forced into marriage in order to gain some financial security. Even wealthy women would be told whom to marry as marriage once again became nothing more than a contract between two wealthy families. Any control over her life would be lost. She would once again become the property of her father, her husband or some other significant male but not herself.

Third, marriage is already an equal partnership and puts women on par with men. Since a man can only marry a woman, she becomes essential to the institution of marriage. Should gay marriage take hold, she would lose the one area of equal status she has always had-that of being a wife. Wives have always had a higher degree of societal status and a larger degree of respect. With the onslaught of women leaving the home and going into the workforce wives have lost that automatic rise in status. Now what a woman does job-wise is how she achieves any sort recognition within society. Which is fine if you are a CEO of Ebay or run some Fortune 500 company but the maid at the Hilton is not significant at all, not even as a wife and/or mother. We have completely undervalued women and torn them from their most important role-that of wife and mother.

Lastly, there are more gay men[about 2.4% of the population] then

English: This protester was on his own and let...

there are lesbians [about 1.2% of the population]. That means gay men will receive far more of the benefits of marriage then women. It also says once and for all that women are irrelevant and have no place inside marriage! It will make the marriage about sex and not procreation and raising children. By defining marriage in such a putrid fashion, we lower our standards and women will once again become sex objects. Vessels of lust and nothing more. By degrading the mother of the species we will be putting our children in danger. For we will undervalue anything that comes from the female-most importantly children. Children have already been cast as the enemy of the women through the pro-abortion movement. We have already turned men against women and tried to completely dismantle the human family. And we see the moral depravity that has resulted from our social engineering.

In closing, even though women will be the ones most adversely affected by gay marriage, their voices are not being heard. It is not about equality because marriage as it currently is known is the most egalitarian institution we have. To tear that asunder would do a disservice to all women and children. If two men want commit sodomy let them do so without the approval of the state. No one is stopping them but marriage needs to be maintained for a healthy society to continue to function. Any feminist should be angry that 2.4 percent of men are being favored over 98.8 percent of women! Is this a fair exchange…is this justice…is this equality? I think not!

New York Passes Gay Marriage Legislation

Published June 25, 2011 by blacknright
Rainbow American flag promoting equality for e...

Image via Wikipedia

There are at least 29 sane people in New York who sit on the legislature. In a vote of 32-29, the New York legislature voted to legalize gay marriage. I would not be exactly dancing in the streets if I was a gay activist as they have taken to doing. This is not a ringing endorsement of gay marriage by a long shot. If anything it should be more discouraging to the winning side that after all this time, they are still barely getting enough votes to pass their agenda.

In fact, in a state as overwhelmingly liberal as New York to have 29 people say no to gay marriage is rather shocking. Trust me, if it was reversed and the legislature had voted it down while I would be happy it didn’t pass, I would be highly concerned that the margin for its failure was so slim.

This is nothing new for the gay marriage camp though, because they know they cannot let the people decide if they want gay marriage in their state or not. Whenever they have, they have lost. In fact, On November 4, 2008, California voters approved Proposition 8 by a margin of almost 600,000 votes. It took a renegade judge, Vaughn Walker,  with his own agenda to undo the will of the people.

History has shown while the people are not always right, the government is more frequently wrong and on the important issues of the day, especially the Court. The Court gave us Dred Scott vs. Sandford, Plessy vs. Fergueson. Taney, who was the Supreme Court justice on the Dred Scott Case is quoted as saying:

 It is difficult at this day to realize the state of public opinion in regard to that unfortunate race which prevailed in the civilized and enlightened portions of the world at the time of the Declaration of Independence, and when the Constitution of the United States was framed and adopted; but the public history of every European nation displays it in a manner too plain to be mistaken. They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations, and so far unfit that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.

 Therefore do not give me the dog and pony show about the “sanctity of our courts” and the “nobleness” of those who sit on the bench. They were wrong in 1857 when Dred Scott was decided, they were wrong in 2009 when they overturned Prop 8 and the legislators were wrong in New York. And for those of who think the gay activists are not trying to destroy marriage but just broaden the concept, there is this gem:

But once the judiciary or legislature adopts “the union of any two persons” as the legal definition of civil marriage, that conception becomes the sole definitional basis for the only law-sanctioned marriage that any couple can enter, whether same-sex or man-woman. Therefore, legally sanctioned genderless marriage, rather than peacefully coexisting with the contemporary man-woman marriage institution, actually displaces and replaces it. [Marriage Facts. Monte Neil Stewart]

 What this really is about is the complete dismantling of marriage and the traditional nuclear family in order to make petulant adults feel good about their own dysfunctional lives. God help us all.

 

UN Accepts Declaration on Sexual Orientation

Published December 28, 2008 by blacknright

Why we don’t just withdraw ourselves from the UN is beyond me. People act like such an act would be unthinkable. Hello, we were responsible for helping to start the United Nations after the League of Nations fell flat on its face. We withdrew from the League back in the day so why can’t we withdraw now? The UN is nothing but a grouping of brutish dictatorships trying to pass themselves as respectable by aligning themselves with the limited democracies that are a part of this cesspool of iniquity. Okay now that I have had my say, on with the article.

The French, who haven’t done anything valiant since Joan of Arc, have put forth a declaration that would essentially codify sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination into international law. While it is supposedly just a declaration with no real enforcement powers, it won’t be long before it is used in that regard. Sixty-seven nations have already signed the declaration, however, the U.S was not one of them. Of course, we know under Barack that could change. The gist of it is this, they are trying to decriminalize sodomy. But let’s look at what sodomy unleashed has given us.

matt-foreman

Matt Forman

HIV/AIDS-with 70% of all people with HIV being gay men you can’t sit there and say it is not a gay disease. It is a gay disease. In fact it’s original name was GRID-Gay Related Immune Deficiency. The gay community once again bullied, threatened and intimidated until it was changed to AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. In fact back in February of this year, Matt Forman the outgoing president of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force had this to say about AIDS:He told them, “Folks, with 70% of the people in this country living with HIV being gay or bi(sexual), we cannot deny that HIV is a gay disease. We have to own that and face up to that.” But I guess he is suffering from internal homophobia huh? LOL

Respectability for NAMBLA and other perverts-to think such an organization could exist out in the open is outrageous but it is largely due to the gay community. Though in public, they have tried to distance themselves from these pedophiles, they have always accepted them as being part of the gay community. Read “After the Ball: How America will Conquer Their Fear and Hatred of Homosexuality in the 90’s. ” where the authors admit as much. There is also a strong correlation sexual abuse as a boy by adult men who then later identify as gay men. It would be downright foolish to deny such a connection. In fact, NAMBLA men feel they are doing something honorable by teaching young boys about pederasty. It is sick and too many define themselves homosexual because of someone else’s depravity.

School indoctrination-you can now find Gay-Straight Alliances in every public high school in the nation. Of course, the focus is on “alternative'” lifestyles and none of it has anything to do with promoting heterosexuality. It is just there to make it look more inclusive then it really is. The Gay-Straight Alliances under the guidance of GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, Straight Education Network) have had a tremendous impact on what is taught in the school in regards to sexuality. Their anti-bullying campaign is pretty ironic since that is the only tactic the gay activists have their disposal to make sure their agenda goes through. I guess it is not okay to bully gays but it is okay to bully Christians, Mormons, straight White males, and anyone else who disagrees with them.

logo

Bathhouses-the only place in the Union where brothels are legal is in Nevada. Reno, more specifically-yet gays are allowed unfettered access to their bathhouses. Even though such establishments only contribute to more STDs and are a threat to public safety they are allowed to exist. Had all these establishments been shut down at the onset of the AIDS crisis and not allowed to re-open there wouldn’t be 70 percent of gay men living with the disease today.the_bowery_-_10_cent_turkish_bath

I could go on but I think you get the gist of it. Homosexuality unchecked hasn’t contributed one positive thing to society. In fact, it has caused more damage that we will paying for, for a long time to come. To continue to go down this road is insanity. Gays should not be encouraged in their lifestyle. Just like we don’t encourage people to overeat, drink alcohol excessively or take dangerous illegal drugs, we shouldn’t encourage homosexuality but should do everything we can to fight against it. We should not take child molestation in this country so lightly. We should support organizations like Exodus International, Evergreen, Homosexuals Anonymous and other ministries that have been successful in having homosexual walk away from the gay life and lead happy, joyous lives. We should oppose all legislation that grants special rights to homosexuals since it is clearly a reversible condition. We should let the UN know they need to stopping bowing to political correctness, clean up their act or we are bailing! It is time we start dealing with the truth of homosexuality and stop believing the lies, too many lives are at risk to do otherwise.

Victory-No Gay High School in Chicago

Published November 21, 2008 by blacknright

high-school-pic

If you go to my page entitled, “Gay Agenda” you will see a story about a gay high school to be built in Chicago. Well it looks like plans to build it have been scrapped. According to the Chicago Sun Times the school has scrapped due to decisions over the school’s name and mission statement which seemed to be lacking any reference to the alphabet community.

“Some lead members of the design team had thought that the latest version of the proposal — which deleted all specific references to gay students from the mission statement and changed the school’s name — had been the best way to garner support for the new school, Chicago public school officials said. But on Tuesday, other members balked.” [Chicago Sun Times. “No Gay High School—At Least Not In ’09” Rosalind Rossi. November 19, 2008]

Though they are promising to have a “stronger version” of the school up for consideration in 2010, one can only hope that it will come to defeat like this one did. Despite the election of Obama and both houses under Democratic rule, liberalism is actually on its way out. If this last week has taught us anything it is that it is not the gays that need protection from bullying….it is us. The gay movement has long worn out its welcome and it won’t be long before it collapses from its own avarice and ambition.

As I commented on in my other article, this is not about serving the youth. It is about the adults and their warped need to experiment with these children’s lives. The Left wants us to believe it is about getting these kids through school and nothing more. That these children are dropping out in droves and not furthering their education afterwards. However, we know gays are tremendously successful later on and many of them have advanced degrees, so this is not a matter of people falling by the wayside and having large poverty statistics. I am not begrudging anyone, gay or straight, success in life. I am only saying there is no barrier that is preventing gays from obtaining an education like there was with Blacks previously. high_schools-grads

It is also ridiculous to base a high school on one’s feelings. If we are going to do that, maybe we should have a high school for cutters or those who are terribly conceited. I know it would’ve made my school experience easier if I didn’t have to deal with the smug, popular crowd. Or are we only basing it on sexual feelings, well what about all the fetishes out there-do they get a school too? School is a time to learn, not a time to engage in risky sexual behavior and nothing is more risky than homosexual behavior.

High school is not the time to form romantic entanglements whether you are gay or straight. High school is preparation for college, so you can get a good paying job so you can have a good life. In our church, dating is looked upon as a group activity. You go out with friends and you learn about the person in that setting first before you go solo. This is smart and definitely safer then allowing teenagers to chaperon themselves on solo dates. Just because adolescents are becoming adults doesn’t mean they are totally ready for all the adult consequences of dating and it is up to us to make sure they don’t have to face those challenges too soon.

As time goes people are starting see just how illegitimate the argument is that all feelings are equal, valid and worthy of exploration. It is time we stop sacrificing our precious youth to help emotionally stunted adults feel better about themselves. This is not about what two consenting adults want to do with each other but giving all our children the best education without segregating them, especially on something as fluid as sexuality. Chicago, you have done the right thing, now don’t blow it in 2010.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 222 other followers