March 19, 2010 by blacknright
Okay, we all now when you are putting out a newspaper or producing a local news channel on television, you are going to have a slow news day now and again. And then you have to go and start creating stories out of thin air. “Local woman prefers Whopper over Big Mac, news at 11.” But some things really take the cake. Let’s look at a couple of stories that were published in Telegraph.co.uk online edition.
Women prefer feminine looking men over masculine men.
Let’s say this was true. Is it true for the vast majority of women? Or just a select few? Now here’s is the kicker. You know what they based this attraction on-health care! You have got to be kidding me!
Now researchers believe that improvements in health care in wealthy western countries mean women do not have to worry about so much about the quality of their offspring – and so are picking more feminine looking men.
They found a direct correlation between the quality of health care and the choice of male.
In countries with better health care, the more likely women would pick a feminine looking man and visa versa.
The result was that in Sweden, which had the best health care, most women (68 per cent) preferred feminine looking men.
Now did they look at the media in Sweden? Did they look at who is promoted as “attractive” in Sweden. Did they look at the magazines, the television shows which has a far more profound effect on who we deem attractive than health care!? No, Sweden has better health care so of course that is the reason they chose feminine looking men.
The article goes on to say:
Dr DeBruine said: “We found that women in countries like Brazil, Argentina and Mexico where the health is poorer were more attracted to masculine looking faces than women in countries like Belgium and Sweden, which have lower mortality rates and higher longevity.”
Basically it is saying poor women have to settle for slack-jawed Neanderthal men because their lack of medical insurance makes it necessary! What? You noticed they picked countries like Mexico, Argentina and Brazil where you find a more darker skinned people and Sweden where it is predominantly White. They are bordering on scientific racism here because the underlying tone is Swedish women are somehow “better” than Mexican women. However, I will give them the benefit of the doubt in this case, even if the whole thing is utterly ridiculous.
Never mind, Mexico is also far more traditional than Sweden and so they would prefer more masculine men because they view men and women in a more traditional sense. Sweden is far more liberal and so it would make sense they prefer the liberal-leaning fem guys. But no, it is health care! Maybe that is why Obama is so set on getting health care passed. He is a fem-looking guy. Maybe he promised all his fem guy friends-“Hey if I get health care passed, you can get all the ladies! Countries with universal health care have women who like sissy men! You’ll be set!”
Note to the scientists-you can’t group 18-40 year old women together like they are the same thing! What I liked at 18, I sure don’t like at forty and one of the things I liked at 18 that I despise now-fem guys!
And while we are talking men and women, here’s one for you. A genderless person. Britain really-put down the pipe and get off the crack!
Norrie May-Welby, 48, was born a man but had a sex change operation in 1990, at the age of 28.
After becoming unhappy as a woman, May-Welby decided to become a “neuter”. The 48-year-old is now officially recognised as a person of no specific gender.
But wait, haven’t we been told if we just go around giving all these “transgender” people operations that they will all be happy from that point on and we are just being mean not ponying up thousands of dollars to pay for their operations, “medication” and other things. Well this person got the operation they weren’t happy. So now we are just supposed to address this person as what? It? Thing. At some point you are going to have to use a pronoun people!
May-Welby said: “The concepts of man or woman don’t fit me. The simplest solution is not to have any sex identification.”
The UK’s Gender Trust welcomed the case. A spokesman said: “Many people like the idea of being genderless.”
Okay well if many people like it let’s do it then. Many people thought lynching Black people was a good idea. Many people think rape is an excellent idea-Ted Bundy sure did. Many people like the idea of skinning kittens. If many people like, I am sure it is an excellent idea. Is it no wonder Britain is going down the toilet and the only sane person in the entire country seems to be Daniel Hannan? And I love how this person says it is the simplest solution. Really? Simple-maybe for you but not for the rest of us. But I forgot, it is all about you, May isn’t it? Just like it is all about each and every one of us and we don’t have to take other people into account. But I shouldn’t be too hard on May, this is obviously a very sick person. But I am mad at the government for celebrating and validating this person’s sickness instead of trying to help them. It is gross negligence at its worst.