Some things are just so outrageous that you couldn’t make them up even if you sat down and tried your hardest to come up with the most insane premise. Remember that fellow that got elected in November who keeps telling us that we are in the worst financial situation since the Depression (guess he missed the 70’s with its energy crisis that forced motorists to get gas on certain days and skyrocketing unemployment! )? Well obviously we are not so bad off that we can’t spend 2.6 million dollars on Chinese hookers to help them with their drinking problems. That is right, we are going to send federal funds to China to help them get their hookers into AA! It is under the guise of trying to alleviate HIV. Yeah right, basically it is just some horny politicians trying to figure out how they can get the taxpayers to foot the bill so they can get drunk and laid Asian style!
According to CNS News: The National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAA), a part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), will pay $2.6 million in U.S. tax dollars to train Chinese prostitutes to drink responsibly on the job.
So let’s look at this carefully. They don’t want them to stop drinking altogether. They don’t want them to stop prostituting themselves. They simply want them to have a white wine spritzer instead of Wild Turkey while servicing their john! The whole world has lost their ever loving mind! Hookers are the new gays. Like gays before them, they want acceptance for the deviant acts they commit. Also like gays before them they want to decide what they are called-sex workers. Yeah and I would like to be called slender or a rocket scientist-ain’t happening dearie! But that is another essay altogether. Let’s stick with the topic at hand. Our government sees fit to send 2.6 million dollars to China for an immoral purpose, while trying to maintain it has a humanitarian benefit. Heck, even if you are an American prostitute you should be ticked. Why are they sending money to China, a country who hasn’t known a human right they can’t abuse, instead of the streetewalkers right here on Hollywood and Vine? I am sure they would like a cut of the 2.6 million and if they had to drink less to get it, they would be more than willing to cut back to one six pack instead of three.
The whole thing is utter lunancy. We can’t afford to get updated library books for my son’s school but we can afford to send 2.6 million dollars to Chinese hookers? Are you frickin’ kidding me? If it wasn’t so utterly and morally repugnant, it would almost be laughable. If I didn’t have to make the hard decisions about how many teachers would be hired back at my son’s school next year, I could have a good hearty laugh about how simply outrageous this is. However, when you are nickeling and diming yourself to death, when you can only have a nurse at your child’s school 2 days a week because there is not enough money in the budget, then it stops being funny real fast. With an additional 2.6 million how many teachers could be rehired? Not a whole heck of a lot, but at least we wouldn’t have to lay off 5,000 teachers. Now mind you, this is coming from someone who absolutely abhors the public school system. Personally, I think we should fire everyone and just start all over. But even with all its countless faults, it provides a much needed service. And I would rather see 2.6 million go to the schools then to some drunk hookers!
So I mentioned earlier this was all in attempt to alleviate HIV. Here is what they are proposing: Previous studies in Asia and Africa and our own data from FSWs [female sex workers] in China suggest that the social norms and institutional policy within commercial sex venues as well as agents overseeing the FSWs (i.e., the ‘gatekeepers’, defined as persons who manage the establishments and/or sex workers) are potentially of great importance in influencing alcohol use and sexual behavior among establishment-based FSWs,” says the NIH grant abstract submitted by Dr. Li.
“Therefore, in this application, we propose to develop, implement, and evaluate a venue-based alcohol use and HIV risk reduction intervention focusing on both environmental and individual factors among venue-based FSWs in China,” says the abstract.
Okay now let’s try this in English and not Mandarin. What in the world are they talking about? I know if you want a reduction in HIV tell them to stop being whores!!!! You think that might do the trick! (Pun not intended). First of all the two biggest groups with HIV are men who sleep with men (MSM) and drug addicts that use needles. In fact, it is almost unheard of for a woman to pass it to a man! So how are you reducing HIV, because even if she has it, her chance of passing it to her john is very slim! He is a lot more likely to give it to her than vice versa. So if you were being intellectually honest, wouldn’t it make more sense to do the study on the johns and not the prostitutes? The only way you can reduce HIV in that environment is by testing every john that walks in the door, otherwise this whole thing is futile. Truthfully, this is a load of bull that they are trying to pull over the American taxpayers’ eyes. Let’s look at this logically:
1) They are testing the wrong population! The prostitutes are not the ones transmitting the virus therefore they shouldn’t be the target of the study.
2) It is drugs that have the larger impact on whether you get AIDS, not alcohol. Specifically drugs like heroin, in which you inject it with a needle are liable to share needles. Mind you, this whole alcohol/AIDS correlation is based on that alcohol lowers your inhibitions so you are more likely to engage in risky sexual behavior. Excuse me he’s at BROTHEL and she’s works at one!!!! I think any time you step foot into one risky sex is PROBABLY WHAT YOU ARE LOOKING FOR!!!
3) Seventy percent of those with AIDS are gay or bisexual men. Therefore wouldn’t it make more sense to concentrate on male prostitutes, if we are going to do this insane thing, then female ones?
Now here’s the clencher: Li said his study is being done in China rather than the U.S. because prostitution occurs with alcohol use in the United States like it does in China, Americans will be able to benefit from the project’s findings.
What? We are doing it in China instead of the United States because it is going to help people in the United States? Does that make sense to you? Now remember, seventy percent of HIV positive people in the United States are gay and bisexual men! So how is surveying heterosexual sex in China going to help them? The whole thing is nothing but a sham and they are hoping the people of the US are so scared and intellectually backwards when it comes to their knowledge of HIV that they can push this through. Basically, it is about some perverts getting their freak on in China! You are doing a bang up job Obama! Oops was that sexually inappropriate? Because this whole study is that is for sure.