Prop 8 Justices to Uphold the Will of the People?

Michael McKee wrote a piece that looks like the judges who took away our right to decide same sex marriage last time might actually follow the law this time around. So far this has been a fight of semantics.  Is it a revision or an amendment? Is it a marriage or a domestic partnership? And while they are fighting over words, some of us are fighting for the institution of marriage.  Counterfeits like domestic partnerships, civil unions and other such fraudulent unions also need to be done away with. Just like we don’t allow people to use counterfeit money to pay their debts (I wish we did because I have a whole bunch of Monopoly money that would get me out of debt in no time!) we shouldn’t allow counterfeit marriages to be considered legal and binding in the eyes of the law. Such counterfeits undermine the true institution of marriage and make a mockery of it.

Michael McKee wrote back in July 2008 that the conservative movement backing Prop. 8 was crumbling because there seemed to be a dispute about one of the backers.    http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202423011880
Of course what people like Michael McKee and the liberal establishment fails to realize is that though the liberal world is identified by the organizations in which they belong, the conservative world is not. If I up and decided to leave AFA, FRC, Silent No More, Exodus International or any of the other organizations I associate with, I would still be conservative. My views are my views and not the property of FRC. Of course, we see just how accurate he was about us crumbling. We passed Prop. 8 and now it time to uphold the will of the people.

The justices have 90 days to make a decision regarding Prop 8 but it looks like this time they are going to do the right thing and uphold the amendment. It is the No on Prop 8 people who are running scared and who continue to try to wrap this up in a false dichotomy of equality versus discrimination.  However, none of their arguments are based on any sound theory or scientific fact.  Whereas,  social science has continually found that the nuclear family is the ideal for the upbringing of children.  Feelings and emotions are great within that familial structure but to base our society and civilization on such shaky and unproven theories,  let alone emotions  to make maladjusted adults feel better about their abnormality is grossly dangerous.  It is time to stop thinking about the adults and start thinking about children-they are the ones who suffer in all this.

Obama To Lift Restrictions on Embryonic Stem Cell Research

Nothing this man does surprises me. In fact, for me to be surprised he would have to act in the best interest of the American people and not his twisted ideology.  In his world, embryos just abound all by themselves. In the real world, you need to put women in danger to make this “science” work.  Let’s put aside that you are killing a human life to make this so call science work.  Let’s put aside all the moral qualms one has about killing embryos and what that means.  How do you produce embryos? You produce them by knocking women up-hello! Why is there not more outrage from the women’s organizations?  This is no more than using women as chattel!

What do you need to make an embryo? A woman’s egg! That means you give women dangerous drugs to stimulate her ovaries, so they will produce more than the customary one egg.  You then go inside a woman and in an invasive procedure extract the eggs mix them with sperm (which is a whole lot easier to get and doesn’t require any surgery, just a porn mag and a hand!) and then only then do you have an embryo! In fact, there are not even enough women of child-bearing age on the entire planet to even make embryonic stem cell research a possibility to cure any disease! So why do we keep pursuing it! Obama says he will be guided by science not ideology.  Well, if that is the truth why isn’t he pursuing adult stem cells which come from the person themselves and have worked successfully in over 70 therapies  and treatments already?  Why? Because he cares nothing about science and is guided by his thirst for power.

Adult stem cells can even mimic embryonic stem cells without the cancer that embryonic stem cells cause. That’s right, not only do you have to put women in danger and kill a human being but embryonic stem cells have proved cancerous in the therapies used.  To further elaborate on the dangers embryonic stem cell research causes to women, when women have undergone voluntary in vitro fertilization to have their own children the following side effects have been reported:

1) kidney failure

2) enlarged ovaries

3) blood clots

4) death

Of course, if you go to any IVF site they won’t tell you about the deaths from Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS)  and will simply tell you about the nausea and bloating.  What they also don’t tell you that unlike men who make sperm their entire lives women are born with a fixed number of eggs.  “A woman is born with her entire life supply of eggs, approximately 1-2 million. At the time of her first menstrual period, the number of eggs has diminished to 300,000-400,000. Each cycle, hundreds of eggs undergo stimulation and usually only one is released during ovulation; the others are reabsorbed and are not functional.”

http://www.infertilityspecialist.com/age_infertility-trolice.html

So just getting our period means we have already lost hundred of eggs and you want to take more from us? For what? For a child we won’t even get to hold?  So you can kill it and kill the person who will receive these treatments?  All this is about money, not science! It is barbaric and feminists who are telling the government to stay out of their wombs need to be doing in this case because in this case everyonoe loses! Only the mad scientists and hateful ideologues like Obama win! OBAMA-STAY OUT OF MY WOMB!!!!

Woman Marries Dolphin (No, I Am Not Joking!)

dolphinGay activists have said for years that their ability to marry would not open the door for these insane practices.  They couldn’t say why not but often said we were just using it as a smokescreen to deny them the rights they so deserved.  So now it has finally happened.  A woman has “married” a dolphin.  Now, no one loves dolphins more than me but come on people-this is sick!

And did anyone ask the dolphin if  he wanted to “marry” this crazy woman? If you are so gung ho on animal rights, shouldn’t this dolphin had been consulted before forced into a marriage with some broad he has seen a handful of times over his 35 years.  Now it is stuck with this partner it did not choose! We are always saying people should be able to pick their own marriage partners, shouldn’t that go for dolphins too? And how is the dolphin going to explain this to his “old lady” that he might already have?

The marriage took place in Israel of all places.  You know Jesus is up there going, “Okay you know that whole “Chosen People”  thing? I take it back! You guys are a bunch of loons!” The woman who married the dolphin is named Sharon Tendler.  She is a 41 year old  Jewish British woman.  The dolphin she married is “Cindy.” (What a mean thing to do to a “man” give him a girly name like Cindy!) Sharon has declared, “I’m so happy. I made a dream come true, and I am not a pervert.” Isn’t that the first thing you say when you ARE in fact, a pervert.  No one ever says, “I love my husband….and I am not a pervert.” It is the perverts who actually try to convince people they are not! Now this marriage is not actually legal….for now.  But it begs the question, why not?  Why shouldn’t we allow these two to be wed if marriage is all about love and children are not an integral part of the institution? After all, isn’t that what the gay community has been trying to convince us? Well these two “love” each other and they definitely won’t be having children, so why can’t they marry and have it legally recognized as such?

Gay activists say it is about equality. Well then why are taking an institution that is already equal and making unequal? Marriage as it stands today says, “One man MUST marry one woman.” The woman is recognized as integral to the institution of marriage. And it will be women who will be adversely affected should gay activists get their way. After way, there are more gay men then lesbians, so gay marriage says “Women are unnecessary for the institution of marriage.”  Women’s rights will shrink under gay marriage because if marriage becomes a “right” then men will enforce that right to marry women they want to marry regardless if the woman wants to marry them or not.  You only have to look at arranged marriages to see who benefits the most from those-it is not the women. She has no say in the matter and forced to marry a man she doesn’t love.  And while the divorce rate may be lower in those instances, it is because it isn’t a real option for her to begin with.  Is this what we want to go back to? The days where marriage was forced upon women, when women had no say and when women were subjagated to males?

These counterfeits are not allowing us to progress but are in fact curtailing it.  We are not advancing but are in fact, regressing to a primal and in this case, quite literally, an animal state.  This is not enlightenment, it is chaos! God bless those who continue to tell the truth in this  matter and stand in defense of marriage.

For the whole article on this go here:

http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/british-woman-weds-dolphin/2005/12/30/1135732717451.html

This news story was originally reported in Israeli newspaper-Yediot Ahronot